NBC Action Communities

Blogs
Welcome to NBC Action Communities Sign in | Join | Help
in
Back to NBCActionNews.com Home Blogs

NBC Action Weather Blog

Franklin County Possible Tornado

If you have pictures of the Franklin County funnel, tornado, wall cloud, or thunderstorm please email them to  jnelson@nbcactionnews.com  & weather@nbcactionnews.com

Good evening bloggers.  A couple of spotters reported a possible brief tornado touchdown near Princeton this evening.  The winds were likely pretty weak maybe around 45-60 mph?  This was a tiny cell and if you have NBC on we have been covering it with break-ins showing the towns in the path of the storm.

The pictures of this tiny cell are pretty incredible!

The first picture comes from Shane Kirk at http://www.shanekirk.smugmug.com/  This picture was also in our weather gallery on nbcactionnews.com   The storm structure on this small supercell was almost perfect!

 

Eldon Radda sent in this picture of the storm in Franklin County around Texas Rd. and Jackson Rd.

Here's another great picture from Lisa Wilson!

Jeremy

Published Saturday, June 20, 2009 7:35 PM by Jeremy WxPlus

Comments

 

sportsfreaked said:

Jeremy >>> Those cells to the southwest around Hutchinson will they even have a chance to get here or have we stabilized enough here in the KC metro that they will fall apart? Thanks
June 20, 2009 8:08 PM
 

Nick Rau said:

WOW, what a weird little cell that was south of K.C. very interesting though... a supercellette?
June 20, 2009 8:17 PM
 

Gant said:

http://yfrog.com/5kdscf0402pjx

Here are my pictures from this evening's Franklin County storm.  They were taken looking west from the intersection of Texas Rd & Jackson Rd.  We saw a very weak tornado touchdown in the distance.  Only lasted a couple of minutes.  My camera doesn't zoom in very strongly, but if you click on the first three pictures and look towards the ground you'll see what looks like a white cloud.  That was the very brief touchdown.  No damage and it all fell apart about 10 minutes later.
June 20, 2009 8:43 PM
 

juba said:

Grant 10 minutes is slightly longer for most tornados, wich usually only last for about 1-3 minutes. Sometimes 5.
June 20, 2009 8:54 PM
 

Gant said:

Hi juba.  Let me clarify...the tornado was only down for a couple of minutes.  I was referring to the storm itself falling apart 10 minutes after I took the photos.
June 20, 2009 9:16 PM
 

HillsdaleBruce said:

cool pics Gant...  thanks for posting on the blog.  storm fizzled just short of me, but I saw some horizontal rolling clouds that almost warranted a picture.  I'll take a fizzling storm over a strengthening one any day....easier on the nerves with people, property, and animals.
June 20, 2009 9:20 PM
 

davidmcg said:

Grant, I don't know, but I would say those are about as dramatic as it gets.  I have not seen very many pictures that depict rotation as strong as these do.  These are definitely up there with the best.
June 20, 2009 9:21 PM
 

sportsfreaked said:

Thanks for the pics!!! All of the pics r pretty incedible. Just goes to show how 1 little cell can pack a punch be it a weak punch but still a punch
June 20, 2009 9:28 PM
 

mamaof3girls said:

I could see that cell on my way in to work this evening and thought it looked pretty threatening. My view did not look like that but was still obvious it was a storm. Really good pictures!!!!!
Monica
Pleasanton, KS
June 20, 2009 9:38 PM
 

mnumom said:

Gant,
Beautiful photography! The pictures were amazing. Thank you for sharing.
June 20, 2009 9:51 PM
 

Amos said:

Amazing photos from another interesting weather set up across our area!!!
Has anybody seen what is going on out west. The chances of this getting here are very low, but that is a very small watch box!!!
http://www.spc.noaa.gov/products/watch/ww0487.html
June 20, 2009 10:18 PM
 

davidmcg said:

Small watch box or not you guys in the city are missing one heck of a light show out here.  From here in MLouth it is a real display.  Our dewpoint is climbing again out here as well.  Up to 70.4 now, thats a 0.3 rise in 15 minures.
June 20, 2009 10:35 PM
 

ProPilotUCM said:

I wonder if any of that will make it to Warrensburg, i would like to see a nice light show. =0)
June 20, 2009 10:42 PM
 

Aussie83 said:

Really wish I didn't go into KC today, could have just drove down the road and seen that storm!
June 20, 2009 10:57 PM
 

WilliamR said:

A Mean Storm Vector of 230 Degrees would put it up in NW Missouri/ NE Kansas if it stayed alive, right ?
June 20, 2009 11:05 PM
 

marlina10 said:

Great pictures! Clouds very similar to those passed over my parents house once...made us ver nervous!
June 20, 2009 11:07 PM
 

chieffan07 said:

Hello, I missed the 10:00 newscast. Can someone let me know if we are supposed to have storms in the over night hours? If so, about what time? And should we expect severe weather?  

Thank you
June 20, 2009 11:09 PM
 

chieffan07 said:

Hello, I missed the 10:00 newscast. Can someone let me know if we are supposed to have storms in the over night hours? If so, about what time? And should we expect severe weather?  

Thank you

*******************

The storms should weaken as they move east, thus the chance of severe weather is pretty much nothing for metro and areas east.

Jeremy
June 20, 2009 11:09 PM
 

chieffan07 said:

Sorry about the double post.
June 20, 2009 11:14 PM
 

Aussie83 said:

Well I am no weather expert but the watch that was issued out West says that pretty soon the severe threat will have decreased so that sounds to me like if things were to drift over here hours from now then there would be no chance of anything major.
June 20, 2009 11:14 PM
 

chieffan07 said:

Thanks Aussie.
June 20, 2009 11:18 PM
 

chieffan07 said:

Thank you Jeremy.
June 20, 2009 11:32 PM
 

ProPilotUCM said:

love the pictures by the way, thats what i call i "diet light" supercell.  In otherwords, its more economical.  hehe.  =0)
June 20, 2009 11:44 PM
 

JCHSR22 said:

Wow! those pictures are great you could see the rotation in the whole storm if you saw it live just awesome! Get ready for the heat folks!!!
June 20, 2009 11:54 PM
 

juba said:

Glad they let the watch expire, what purpose dose a 1 county tornado watch play through 1 in the morning? It was ridiculous.
June 21, 2009 1:03 AM
 

Amos said:

That watch was very small, but it was justified because there was a smaller than normal area that warranted the watch.

If the 1 county was the only county that had the risk, then the watch was justified, but with the small size of Kansas counties, if there was a risk, it would encompass more than one county, so was a tad ridiculous.
June 21, 2009 1:28 AM
 

kcwxguy said:

Ok..no one will read this...but wanted to think out loud about tomorrow.

Basically, per the SPC, NWS, and the team here, rain is unlikely tomorrow.  Jeremy gave it 20% or less of a pop up thunderstorm.

I am not sure.  Not saying it is wrong, but I see some things that both pro and con to the rain chances tomorrow.  I will start with the cons...

No surface convergence
Strong 700mb temperatures way over 10C indicating strong capping
Weak mid level lapse rates

Here are some pros to rain occuring

Low and mid level divergence
500mb PVA building into the area near 0Z
Surface low forming to our SW around 0Z
Very strong theta-e levels [low level moisture transport]
Strong heating possible with big dewpoints
Near right front quad of jet streak at 0Z

The divergence would indicate rising air up to about 700mb..perhaps the cap level.  The 500mb PVA would provide some needed lift at 500mb to aid turning over the mid level lapse rates.  Might come out near 6-7.  With the surface low forming to our SW, and with the stationary boundary to our north, we should see perhaps some secondary WAA lifting through our area.

So, with strong temps, strong moisture, and perhaps some WAA, that leads me to think again about convective temps.  At 0Z, both WRF and GFS forecast soundings have about 43-50 j/kg of CINH, which is a weakening cap.

Here is what would need to happen for rain tomorrow.  This precip moving through would need to clear out early to allow for maximum heating.  The surface low progged to form to our SW needs to happen and be what is advertised for strength.

If it does, it should throw up a trough ahead of the 0z 500mb PVA which would create a boundary for forcing.  This should come very close to the metro if not just a hair south, but well within the viewing area.

The main thing still missing is surface convergence.  Most of the wind fields tomorrow indicate SW flow and little veering with height.  We do get a bit of speed shear which is sufficient for thunderstorm updrafts at about 47 m/s.  If the surface low does not form to our SW or does not form strongly, we will not get any surface convergence.  Without that, none of the initiation will be surface based initially.  It will be all elevated missing out on a great deal of instability near the surface.

If something does form, this is the most likely scenario.  However - if there is any remnant outflows, or if that surface low can deepen more than progs and create a bit of a windshift with more backing, then we would have surface convergence, and thunderstorms would quickly blossom in those spots.  Some possibly severe with the amount of surface instability potentially available.

What I am also concerned about should convection occur is the fact that with a SW/NE oriented boundary parallel to the mean flow, training thunderstorms may be possible along the trough.

So, here is what I think in summary - 35% nothing happens.  65% thunderstorms initiate in the viewing area.

If they do, watch for any boundary/troughing nearby in the mid levels and watch for a surface low to the SW.  

More will be known after this convection passes in the morning and we can have a fresh look at surface obs in the panhandle of TX up through SW KS.

June 21, 2009 1:59 AM
 

Dwxtracker said:

I read it Scott! Nice analysis as usual!
June 21, 2009 2:58 AM
 

Bizarro Jerry said:

scott:   you list as a pro for rain 'low level divergence' but that would not support rainfall or storms.  

for storms you want the opposite; convergence at the surface / lower levels and divergence aloft.
June 21, 2009 6:22 AM
 

weatherfreak01 said:

Kcwxguy, do you have any idea how many people read your posts? I know I do. You always come off very knowledgable. Anyway, thanks for the analysis. We will see what happens today. If you are a Dad, Happy Father's day!
June 21, 2009 7:50 AM
 

weatherfreak01 said:

HAPPY FATHER'S DAY to all you Dad's out there!!
June 21, 2009 7:50 AM
 

NBC Action Weather Blog : Franklin County Possible Tornado | paydayloan said:

June 21, 2009 11:51 PM
Anonymous comments are disabled

This Blog

Post Calendar

<June 2009>
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
31123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
2829301234
567891011

Syndication

Inergize Digital Media This site powered by Inergize Digital Media. The views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of this station.